Poverty Is Sexist!Poverty Has a Woman’s Face! dianovapovertyissexist #feminizationofpoverty






Examining the disproportionate effect of poverty on women and girls

Numerous statistics shed light on the variables and mechanisms that foster and perpetuate a status of poverty in women and girls:

  1. Women and girls are more likely to suffer from poor health and malnutrition, less likely to go to school, and more likely to perform unpaid/informal work (i.e. housework, cooking, cleaning, collecting water/firewood, fieldwork, taking care of children and the elderly, etc.).
  2. Women have less access to income-producing labor. For example, in Sub-Saharan Africa, 75% of married men have access to income-producing labor, in comparison to 46% of married women.
  3. Laws and customs hinder women’s access to their own assets, maintaining an economic dependency on men.  In developing countries, 1 in 3 women have absolutely no say in household expenditures.  Moreover, 20% of developing countries do not enforce laws that ensure gender-equal property and inheritance rights, and 28% of developing countries lack laws entirely that ensure gender-equal property and inheritance rights.
  4. The use of formal financial resources is lower for women than for men in every region of the world.
  5. Childhood marriage, childbearing, and exposure to gender-based-violence are variables that increase the likelihood of living in poverty.  Girls who marry before adulthood are less likely to receive an education, less likely to participate in the formal labor market, and more likely to become pregnant before adulthood.  Victims of trafficking, sexual assault or intimate partner violence (which are disproportionately women and girls) are more likely to experience a decline in health, lost or reduced work/education days, substance abuse, marginalization, and a decrease in social and political opportunities, all of which reduce productivity and hinder development.

In the United States, 14.2% of women between the ages of 18-62 live in poverty, in comparison to the 10.5% of men between the ages 18-62 who live in poverty.  Every State has a duty to commit to this issue and urge other States to commit as well.  Justin Trudeau, the Prime Minister of Canada, recently pledged his commitment to ONE’s Poverty is Sexist campaign, declaring, “As a feminist, I know that women must be treated equally everywhere…No one leader can make this happen alone.  We need other leaders around the world to step up too.”

The gender inequalities within poverty are evident and undeniable.  The feminization of poverty is complex, pervasive, and interrelated with a multitude of other issues, such as education, child marriage, the labor market.

The feminization of poverty can no longer be ignored. Governments and institutions must pledge their commitment and foster awareness of this critical issue.

In addition, a gendered perspective should be incorporated into all policies and laws at the local, national, and global level.  Moreover, disaggregated data and the formulation of new measures are needed in order to inform policy and obtain a clearer understanding of gender inequalities within impoverished households.  Finally, women and girls need to have full access to quality education, decent jobs, financial institutions, and technology.  States that prioritize education, accessibility, and inclusion are healthier, wealthier, and more stable.  Sustainable development cannot be achieved unless every citizen of the world is empowered.

For more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *